Blast back to the past with us! See what was happening with the Grand Junction Police Department way back when…….
Wikipedia offers a detailed list of information about Bundy’s murders, including the 1975 murder of Denise Oliverson in Grand Junction, and his escapes from jail.
A couple of weeks ago KKCO reporter Tim Ciesco approached us and the Mesa County Sheriff’s Office about doing a news story on the issues surrounding officers’ “use of force.” What he was looking for was “what officers evaluate when they consider using force” and what their options are. I’m hoping what Tim came away with, which based on the story he aired I’m confident he did, was how quickly that evaluation process has to be done. In a lot of incidents officers face, we’re talking seconds.
The buzz around the police department is that Tim did a good job of giving the public an idea of some of the things officers face when they respond to calls, especially when he had to try to explain a very complex issue in the amount of time he was allotted. And given the newscast is only a half hour, we knew Tim couldn’t include every single piece of information we gave him that day. In fact, we couldn’t even get to everything in this blog if we tried. Think of it this way: new recruits at the Western Colorado Peace Officers Academy go through approximately 175 hours of training on various use of force issues before they can even graduate. At the GJPD, all police officers are required to complete monthly trainings on a number of topics, and use of force issues are included in about 40 hours of that training spread out through the year.
So here are some other tidbits of information most people don’t realize when they hear about an officer having to use force when dealing with an incident:
- A 2008 FBI report indicated 58,792 officers were assaulted while on duty.
- The FBI also reports 48 officers across the country were feloniously killed in 2009. The FBI broke that number into some interesting statistics.
- 941 of the assaults wre committed by an edged weapon, such as a knife.
- According to a study done in the late 90s conducted by Thomas Hontz and Ray Rheingans it took an average of 2 seconds for a person to cover a distance of 30 feet, while the average speed of an officer to access, draw, acquire the target, and fire was 2.06 seconds. That means a person can be nearly 30 feet away and still have time to get to an officer before the officer has time to determine which weapon to use and deploy it.
- According to the FBI “there is sufficient oxygen within the brain to support full, voluntary action for 10 to 15 seconds after the heart has been destroyed.” That means even though a person has been shot in the heart, that person may still be able to come at you for up to 15 seconds. Grab your watch and see how long it actually takes for 15 seconds to tick by.
That takes me back to the earlier comment that I’m pretty sure Tim has a good understanding of how quickly an incident can play out. We used some of the above statistics and put him, as well as three of our officers with varying years of experience, through a realistic scenario. Tim was given everything the officers have on their duty belt and was told to respond to do a welfare check on a man who was sitting in the park. That’s very representative of the types of calls our officers receive. What Tim and the officers didn’t know is the man was armed with a knife. Tim’s story has a few video clips of how he and our officers handled the situation. Here are some photos of the result of the knife attack on Tim (don’t worry, the red stuff is just lipstick we put on the fake knife so we could see where it struck him).
It should also be noted, although I don’t have photos to show you, that the three officers who went through this scenario with the exact same amount of information Tim had also received “cuts” from the knife, even though they fired their guns and likely “shot” the suspect. That means had this been real, the suspect may or may not have been killed, but the officers still would likely have received injuries of various degrees in the process. Just some food for thought.
“Grand Junction is a nice community and I would like to keep it that way! By being on the Volunteer Patrol I can do my part.” – Jim Peterson, GJPD Volunteer Patrol
Like a lot of Grand Junctionites, we here at the GJPD feel very fortunate to live in a great community. One of the biggest components of our community that makes it great is the people; generous folks who are willing to give their time and resources. The GJPD experiences this generosity each and every time one of our 60 volunteers walks through our doors.
Our good fortune is your good fortune. Thanks to our volunteers and a grant from Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad, we are launching our new Volunteer Patrol program. Ten of our 60 volunteers have been selected to participate and have completed training both in the classroom and behind the wheel. Their job: be extra eyes and ears for the police officers who are working to keep your streets safe. The Volunteer Patrol will help with vacation checks, surveillance, and some traffic control. More duties will be added as the program progresses, and all of the time the volunteers donate gives our police officers more time to focus on higher priority areas and incidents.
If you would like to have the Volunteer Patrol do vacation checks on your home when you’re away please call the GJPD at 970-244-3555 to schedule.
Interesting Statistic: Nationwide in 2009 police service volunteers logged 8.1 billion hours, resulting in $169- billion in savings.
When you ask someone what a person who works for the police department does, you’ll likely get a response of “they arrest people” or “they write tickets.” We can’t argue with that. But, with 180 employees within the Grand Junction Police Department, both civilian and sworn, there are many folks here who do amazing things for our community and our police department- beyond just making arrests or issuing tickets. We want you to know about some of these people. We hope you’ll enjoy this insight into some of the work being done as we answer “What Else Do They Do?”
“One of the main things in life is to help each other.” -Steve Gomez
People don’t often think about the amount of personnel that it takes to keep a police station running efficiently on all cylinders. Although he’s officially assigned to the Facilities Department within the City of Grand Junction, we here at the Police Department feel Steve Gomez is one of us because of all of the hard work he puts into our building as the custodian. This particular “What else do they do?” highlights the random acts of kindness Steve has made a frequent occurrence within the walls of the Department, from making sure people make it safely to their vehicles to buying dinner for hungry children while an incident is being worked.
“Maybe they’ll see this act and pass it on,” says Gomez.
Numerous employees at the GJPD can share stories about Steve. One particular occasion where these events stood out was when an officer was dealing with an incident while the witnesses, victims, and their families patiently waited in the police department lobby. There were several young children with them and the evening was dragging on. The children were not only tired, but they were hungry too. Without being asked, Gomez took it upon himself to buy food for the hungry families.
“(The kids) see these things and they never forget it,” explains Gomez, referring to someone doing something nice for them.
This isn’t the first time that Gomez has taken money from his own pocket to pay for meals for people waiting in the lobby.
“I just think, I’ve got the money right now, and I just go do it,” he says.
When asked about such random acts of kindness like these, Gomez just smiles shyly and says, “I don’t like talking about myself.” He doesn’t do these things in search of recognition, making his true kindness and willingness to help others truly commendable. Here are some other highlights of Steve’s career:
- Has been working with the City for 7 years
- Is also the custodian for Fire Station 1, but frequently helps with other areas of the City too
Other things Steve has said:
“One of the main things in life is to help each other.”
“I thought it would be different working here. People would say ‘That’s the police department!’ But everyone here is so nice.”
“It’s sad to see little kids who are hungry.”
Whether it’s the national statistics you’re looking at, or just what’s happening right here at home, the issues surrounding kids running away from home are frightening.National Statistics:
- 2.8 million teens run away from home each year
- 1.6 million teens slept on the street in the past 12 months
- Most are between the ages of 15 and 17
- 1 in 3 will be lured into prostitution within 48 hours of running
- The GJPD handled 230 runaway cases in 2009
- 36 of those were habitual runners
- The youngest runner so far this year was 12 years old
- Female runners often become victims of sexual assault or are caught with sex offenders
There are a number of reasons they run, ranging from issues at school, family problems, abuse, threats to their safety, and drug and alcohol abuse. There is only one thing they and their families need: help.
November is National Runaway Prevention Month, and the GJPD is using this occasion to bring awareness to these troubling statistics and provide support for our local kids. You can do the same, and it won’t cost you much more than a few minutes of your time.
- Get your kids involved and be a part of the GJPD Runaway Prevention Photo Contest. From November 1st through the 26th students in grades K-12 can submit photos that show how to prevent kids from running away. The photos will be displayed in the lobby and judged by GJPD employees. Winners will receive a prize. Non-returnable photos can be dropped off at the GJPD at 625 Ute Ave. Photos should be no larger than 8×10.
- Physically show your support by participating in the national Green Light Project and shine a green light at your home or business. Grand Junction City Hall will be doing this for the entire month starting this week.
- Learn about the wealth of resources available by stopping by the GJPD to pick up some brochures or by visiting our website. You can find a list of activities there and hear what several runaways have to say by watching a short but powerful video.
- Spread the word about a 24 hour national hotline available to both parents and kids: 1-800-RUNAWAY
Kids don’t belong on the streets. Even if they think they can cut it on their own they are still kids. We’ll do our part and continue working with runners, their families, and other local agencies to get them the help they need. We hope you will do what you can as well.
Some of the folks who were around Grand Junction in 1975 called it the “killing season.” There were multiple murders, multiple tragedies, multiple families suffering tremendous losses.
One of those cases involved a beautiful young woman, Linda Benson, and her 5-year-old daughter Kelley Ketchum, who were murdered in an exceptionally horrible way in their apartment in 1975. Detectives from the Grand Junction Police Department launched a top-notch investigation, gathering hundreds of pieces of evidence, and speaking to dozens of people who may hold the clue to who did this. It was their work that would provide a solid foundation for what would become a guilty verdict.
For years, theories spread throughout the community. Was it the husband? Was it someone she knew? Or could it have been a complete stranger? It would take 35 years to get the answer.
In 2007 GJPD Commander Greg Assenmacher, at the time overseeing the Investigations Unit, laid a fresh set of eyes on what had long since become a cold case.
“After reviewing the case and seeing the traumatic event I felt we, as a police department, needed to do everything we could to try to bring a resolution for the victims’ family and bring someone to justice,” Cmdr. Assenmacher said at the time.
Current detectives had the one thing their 1975 colleagues didn’t: DNA technology. It would prove to be the key link between a scene now more than 30 years old, and a suspect.
Blood samples collected from the apartment had been held in storage the entire time, and in those samples was DNA from Jerry Nemnich. His blood was on various items within the apartment, in multiple rooms, even on the body of Linda Benson.
Cmdr. Assenmacher enlisted the help of retired GJPD officer Larry Bullard. Bullard, who volunteered most of the time he spent working on this case, worked tirelessly, hunting down clue after clue.
“In 1975, the officers did an impeccable job. If they hadn’t done their job the way they did, we wouldn’t have been able to do our job,” Bullard said.
Eventually the ultimate clue was revealed.
Grand Junction, 2009.
In January 2009 the Colorado Bureau of Investigations completed its analysis of some of the blood samples from the apartment. The result? a 1-in-1-quintillion(1,000,000,000,000,000,000) chance the blood belonged to someone other than Jerry Nemnich. A viable suspect had been revealed.
Jerry Nemnich, now 65 years old, was very familiar with the prison system. His first felony conviction came at the age of 15, with four more to follow. Two of those convictions included brutal rapes in which he held his victims at knife point, threatening to kill them. Nemnich was in and out of prison until the age of 50.
Current detectives had a dilemma when deciding how and when to contact Nemnich. Give him the heads up and he might run and disappear forever. Not talk to him and the people who know him, and they might miss out on some key information. In the end, the strategy they came up with worked.
In February 2009 the GJPD, along with the CBI and the DA’s office formed a task force, under
the direction of current GJPD Investigations Commander Mike Nordine. The plan: build a background on Nemnich by tracking down and talking to people who knew him in 1975 but who aren’t in contact with him now. GJPD Detective Sean
Crocker was assigned as the case agent, and he and CBI Agent Brooks Bennett began a months long journey that would take them across the country and into homes of people who hadn’t thought about Jerry Nemnich for decades. They were able to gain valuable information and evidence, including 2 bounced checks Nemnich wrote just days after the murder, that not only placed him in Grand Junction at the time, but showed he lived very near to the crime scene.
Detective Crocker says the biggest arrest he’s ever made came in April 2009. After working with Nemnich’s employer, an over the road trucking company, detectives were able to convince Nemnich’s bosses to route him through the Loma Port of Entry as he returned from a trip. Officers were waiting, and took him into custody.
“I personally handcuffed a murder suspect from the 1970s. It was unreal. It was very surreal,” Det. Crocker said.
What did Nemnich have to say when they told him he was under arrest?
“Not a word,” Crocker said.
Grand Junction, 2010.
Following the arrest, the task force work continued. Additional blood samples were analyzed. More interviews were conducted. What would be presented to a jury was gathered, scrutinized, and planned. And those on the task force tracked down what turned out to be some valuable witnesses.
In 1960 Nemnich raped a 15-year-old girl at knifepoint. In 1968 Nemnich raped a woman in Pueblo at knifepoint. Investigators knew their stories could be emotional accounts that could prove useful during trial. But after decades had passed, finding them would be tough. GJPD Investigation Sgt. Tony Clayton began with some internet searches for their names, but came up with nothing. Then he took a shot in the dark.
“I thought maybe she still has a relative that lives in Colorado, so I put in her last name she was using in 1968 and came up with about 60 people,” Sgt. Clayton says referring to the 1968 victim. “I just picked one of the people on the list and called that person. As luck would have it, that person turned out to be a relative of the woman we were looking for.”
It was a similar search that led Sgt. Clayton to a 1960 Nemnich rape victim. This time help from a police department in the town where she was raped was the key link.
Finding the women was difficult. Convincing them to break open wounds and relive their ordeals was even harder.
“This was in their past, decades ago, and we were dredging it up again. People in their families didn’t even know about these cases, and all of the sudden they were going to be exposed.”
It was a tough sell, but after explaining the importance of them telling their story to a jury they realized “this guy needed to be put away.”
What the detectives and prosecutors didn’t have was a conversation with Nemnich; he declined to speak with them. In fact, the first time they heard any of Nemnich’s account of what took place in 1975 came at the same time the rest of the public heard it; during his surprise testimony a week into his trial. Det. Crocker got word he was going to testify shortly before he took the stand.
“I thought this is going to be good…. this is going to be good,” Det. Crocker said. “To see what story he’s made up either in the last 35 years or the last 5 minutes.”
Nemnich’s story put him right at the crime scene. The Daily Sentinel did a good job of recounting Nemnich’s story, a story in which he proclaimed his innocence saying he stumbled upon the bodies after being attacked by a knife-wielding person.
“The defense had worked so hard to shoot holes in the evidence, the DNA, and then he put himself right there at the scene.”
Unfortunately for Nemnich, his testimony contradicted much of the evidence. And then District Attorney Pete Hautzinger dropped two bombshells during his closing arguments. Nemnich testified he simply put his fingers on the throats of Linda and Kelley to check for a pulse after they were already dead. Hautzinger then asked the jury if that were true, then how did Nemnich’s DNA end up underneath Linda’s fingernails? And if Nemnich entered the apartment through the open front door and ran out after finding the bodies, why was the front door closed and locked from the inside when Linda’s husband came home the next day and found Linda and Kelley?
The jury began their deliberations at 9 am on October 26th. They wouldn’t announce they had a verdict until late in the afternoon on the 27th, nearly two full days later. It’s said that if a jury takes a long time to deliberate, it’s good news for the defense. But, that’s not always how it turns out. Det. Crocker never doubted the case, though, and never doubted what the jury would come back with.
“We had a strong case. There was a lot of evidence to look through. There was the testimony from Nemnich’s prior victims. If I was a juror I’d want to look through all of that stuff.”
Det. Crocker’s faith was upheld. So was Larry Bullard’s, who also said there was never a doubt in his mind. The jury came back with guilty verdicts on the two counts of 1st degree murder, and guilty of felony murder for Linda Benson. The mandatory sentence for 1st degree murder is life in prison without the possibility of parole.
There weren’t any outbursts in the courtroom when the verdict was read. There wasn’t any wailing or crying. There were some tears, though. You could see the flood of emotions flowing through Linda and Kelley’s family members, but mostly what appeared to be relief mixed with gratitude. Some of the investigators who had put so much time and effort into this were choked up too, and there were lots of hugs going around. Nearly everyone just seemed glad it was over.
“We opened a wound that was 32-years-old at the time,” said Bullard in reference to Linda and Kelley’s family. “They were at a point where they were going on with their lives and all of a sudden we brought this to the front of their minds again.”
Bullard did have something to say to Linda’s mother, Barbara Rippy, as the courtroom began to clear.
“Finally. Sorry it took so long.”
Barbara’s response, “Thank you.”
In fact Barbara could be heard telling anyone who helped with this case “thank you,” and she backed it up with big hugs. One could only imagine what this has been like for her.
Around the Police Department this case, and now the verdict has been the big topic of discussion. People here are relieved it’s over, and relieved the jury came to the conclusion they did.
“They took their job very seriously, and they did a good job with it,” says Bullard.
There are some pats on the back for the folks who were involved in the investigation too. Their hard work paid off. But if you ask the people who were closest to this case what they’re feeling today they may not be able to sum it up. That’s because the real inspiration for what they did, Linda and Kelley, are still gone. They just hope their family will finally feel some peace after 35 years.